In early April last year, I wrote an essay about the 2020 C-19 pandemic titled “What if...” Now, ten months later, I’m more convinced than ever that I was on the right track. The question, “What if” has proven precisely the right question to ask. What if everything that has happened since late 2019 was deliberate? What if all the misery and death was not the result of some disastrous plague that fell upon the earth resulting in some unfortunate “pandemic” – what if we’re really NOT all in this together (as some like to suggest) rather, what if this were deliberately planned and carefully orchestrated? Back in April however, I simply could not have imagined just how dark and evil this whole thing might be – were it indeed planned.
My initial essay can be found at: https://cblform.blogspot.com/2020/04/what-if.html In that article I countered the myth/lie that the virus somehow escaped from a wet market in Wuhan China. It seemed this Wuhan virus was far more likely to have been specially created in a laboratory. For what purpose? At the time I wrote that first essay, I pondered:
“What if the reason the Chinese were so quickly able to determine the causative virus was because they already knew where it likely came from and already had information on it from their ongoing studies? What if their insistence for proposing it all came from Patient zero at a nearby market, and all their subsequent actions were part of a cover-up - all to give them plausible deniability?”
I notice that since very early in 2020, China has been consistently leading the choir with the rest of the world following meekly along. China’s CCP has been the entity directing the course of every step in the pandemic dance and has been in the driver’s seat throughout its course. In numerous ways, China has been centrally involved with all stages of the Covid-19 journey beginning with the development and outbreak, through identifying and selectively sharing information, continuing through the acquisition of “personal protective equipment,” and on to testing method selection and case identification. Even recommended treatments and vaccine sourcing have been greatly influenced by this communist regime. (Canada first tried to get a vaccine supply deal from China).
China (which has no regard at all for human rights or freedoms) led with the lock-downs, the so called “social distancing” and isolation, and let’s not overlook indiscriminate, mandated masking. The outcomes of following all these measures resulted in the squashing of numerous basic freedoms, valued by democracies throughout the western world, freedoms such as free speech, free assembly and freedom to move about. Not surprisingly, led by a scripted and determined media effort, almost all the rest of the world followed suit. With very few exceptions, China has clearly been in charge. Resistance of all types (to the above imposed suppressive measures) has been brutally and relentlessly targeted with the intent being to totally silence, de-platform and destroy all who refuse to mindlessly go along.
Led by a persistent, relentless media effort, fear and paranoia were whipped up to a near ‘stampede’ like intensity. Report after report and dire prediction after dire prediction (all from supposed experts) have been broadcast multiple times per hour throughout the past ten months. Dire warnings and prognostications by these “experts” continue telling us that millions of our fellow citizens are going to die as our hospitals collapse and fail within months. All these predictions have been based on very flawed modelling and this fact was pointed out very early in the process. Every prediction has been miles off the mark and the reality has been nowhere near as serious as the repeated dire warnings. The intent, it seems, has always been to promote fear – never to simply provide information.
Despite the obvious faulty prognostications, the daily paranoia-generating reports persist. Since the very beginning, we’ve been told the only path to safety was (and remains) the near absolute government control of our freedom. Many governments removed or severely limited the access to (and control of) various tools we have for self-governance in a free society – tools which normally provide a system of checks and balances on governing power and allow various forms of citizen challenges and redress. Courts were closed or severely restricted, legislatures were shut and power was transferred to cabinet level decision making. Non-elected bureaucrats were given unimaginable power and sway over everyday citizen activities – and no means to effective challenge was permitted. We were then witness to the removal of many of our most basic rights and freedoms as we were forced into various national house arrest schemes. We were assured this was absolutely necessary and if we relinquished those rights for just a couple weeks, we would “flatten the curve” thus insuring our own relative safety...AND such would be necessary before we might return to “normal.” (The implied threat must not be overlooked and was included for anyone just wanting life to return to normal.) Those 2 weeks to “flatten the curve” never ended but turned into a lengthy, unending series of excuses for why our freedoms should not be fully returned. At this point no one can clearly state what the goal is in order for those freedoms to be returned. Quite simply, we were – and continue to be - lied to.
So, after stealing away the citizenry's basic civil and constitutional rights, those pushing this unwholesome narrative proceeded to dangle those rights in front of us all, promising to give them back only if we agreed to do everything we’re told. By this I’m reminded of the schoolyard bully who steals a child’s hat and then taunts them with it. Of course, added to this strategy was the good old slogan “we’re all in this together.” This shallow slogan was yet another lie; indeed, some ended up paying the highest price possible while others made out like bandits acquiring unimaginable profits and assets. Others lost everything they owned.
Perhaps, driven by the fear of a backlash from a panicked public – or simply in response to those controlling them from behind the scenes, it was the various governments who unilaterally picked the winners and losers while deciding who would bear the bulk of the cost of their ordered lock-downs. One segment of society (among whom were many from the public sector) were paid to stay home and do nothing while others (declared essential) had to continue working for their income. One can only imagine the problems this might produce in the long term as the workforce was thus fractured in several significant ways.
But of them all, small business was picked to be the biggest looser and bear the brunt of most of the cost. Restaurants, small service orientated businesses such as hair cutting shops and various other small retail shops were ordered closed. While all the costs of running the business continued unabated and without relief (costs such as rent, staff wages, bank loans, materials and equipment maintenance etc) the businesses themselves were stripped of their ability to generate revenue thus leaving the owners with insufficient income to survive. Caught in such an impossible squeeze, survival itself dictated the first to go were the employees and soon to follow would be the business itself.
The government ordered shut-down was soon reinforced by a frightened public that were sufficiently prepared by the media to demand more and more restrictive measures in the mistaken belief this was the only way to save themselves. Believing the relentless narrative, by this point many in the public were convinced they faced a most terrifying and deadly pandemic. Many who are displaying this irrational fear have gone on to develop a paranoia of healthy human interaction and will run from the presence of another person who appears anywhere close to them in an unmasked state. Contrary to their irrational fear, the survival rate should one contract Covid, is better than 99% - such fear puts me in mind of a five year old child's fear of the boogie man. It is note-worthy that the major division at this point for ending the lock-down of society is between those with an income and those without. For many, science had long since flown out the window to be replaced largely by chaos, panic and paranoia.
So, if what has happened was somehow designed, the question is obviously, “why, and to what end?” I think that to answer this question (at least in part) we need to look at actual winners and losers, gains and losses. On the political front one obvious change is the massive changes made to voting coupled with the removal of the normal safeguards in the 2020 US election. The Democrats were able to effect enough voting rule changes to ultimately obtain the results they were planning for.
During this same period of time, there was a nearly unchecked movement of rioting, burning, looting and massive destruction coupled with the embrace and large growth of the socialist/communist movement. Thriving economies were brought to a grinding halt (not just in the USA but in most other thriving world economies). There has been the near elimination of a great many small businesses and a sizable portion of the middle class along with them. Large parcels of once valuable business properties were vacated, burned or otherwise made easily obtainable for wealthy globalist interests. Huge multi-national business thrived - gobbling up that which small business had lost - and making huge profits and gains that had never heretofore been obtained. Companies like Costco, Amazon and Walmart made out like bandits while small businesses, offering the same goods and services, were ordered closed. For more in depth reporting on these activities and evidence describing events in much greater detail than I can include in this short essay, I strongly suggest checking out the following links:
Another government selected winner would be big-pharma and their vaccine industry. Throughout this “pandemic” quite a few reasonably priced treatments and medications showed great promise in helping afflicted individuals get safely through their period of illness. Some treatments are supportive, some preventative and some curative. All such therapeutics have been either ignored, downplayed, denied or forbidden with doctors being censored and forbidden to use some agents at the expense of loss of their license. At no time has there been any real concerted efforts to treat and cure the illness and all the effort has been placed on obtaining a vaccine. The public has been led to believe it’s either the vaccine or else remain locked-down and isolated.
Of course the vaccines appeared in record time and were approved for use - without sufficient testing - on an “emergency,” experimental basis. The companies and backers of these experimental biological agents stand to make monstrous profits. Sadly, such profits may, and likely will, come at a very high human cost. The eugenics groups, on the other hand, may be very satisfied with the results.
Personally, I have never believed the narrative we've been hearing. None of the measures taken for this virus make any sense. To be clear, I do believe there are pathogens involved, certain risks are real, and some people have died...unfortunately that's all true. However the overall death rate from all causes has not risen in 2020 from what it was for the previous five years according to CDC statistics – this clearly flies in the face of the "pandemic" claim. Quite simply, THERE IS NO PANDEMIC. Speaking as a nurse with over 30 years working in different hospitals and health care settings, I have seen how infectious diseases are supposed to be handled and how PPE is supposed to be used. I've also been aware of far more serious diseases and viral outbreaks that have never been used (and used is the correct term here) used to promote such a bizarre agenda and accompanying treatment approach. The wholesale loss of freedoms (assembly, speech, religious liberty, informed consent etc) makes no sense at all for a virus that is not all that lethal. If I caught it now the odds of my survival are better than 99%. We simply don't crash whole global economies for something like this.
Moving forward from just a year ago, the picture takes on an eerie look - somewhat like the one dismissed as mere conspiracy at that time. We don’t have one body yet controlling all nation states – but there seems to be an ever increasing push toward it and we are hearing about “The Great Reset” along with the “Build Back Better” mantra – all actually contained within a globalist playbook. And we must consider also the push toward a single global currency.
Once one begins to think about global governance, the obvious comes to mind as a potential vehicle to achieve this...what about the UN? People seem largely convinced that the UN is a good thing – it was set up for keeping world peace, after all. Yet looking at the reality, the UN seems involved in lots of things except keeping the peace – they don’t do that very well at all! Their committees on human rights are often dominated by members that have the worst human rights records – they do very little to actually promote human rights. The security councils do nothing to keep the world secure – they’re more of a joke. What they seem to be more interested in is things like global population control and redistribution, global resource management, global wealth redistribution and taking over various areas of national government sovereignty and constitutionally guaranteed rights. Is this really their agenda - or is this just a coincidence and it only looks this way?
Wow. To accomplish all this without using force would require a population that is largely willing to go along with such a plan. They’d have to see it as their only option to a problem – a crisis of such terrible consequence that their own safety was at stake continuously. They’d have to be willing to trade everything for a promise of greater security and see it as their only option. You’d have to gin up a whole lot of fear AND it couldn’t be based on rumour alone – there would have to be a certain underlying degree of fact. Some people would have to die. (The most effective lies have a modicum of truth within them). With a few facts in place, results and outcomes could be exaggerated and the fear factor built upon. With the right kind and amount of propaganda, you would not have to convince everyone or all the leaders – you’d only have to convince/frighten a significant enough portion of the population to create growing unrest (in the animal world this would be known as a stampede). Once the stampede begins reason largely goes out the window.
Written by Roger Hild
