Friday, September 20, 2024

A Brief Examination of Seventh-day Adventist Doctrine

In my last essay, I did a little digging into the “Second Great Awakening” and some of the religious groups (as well as cultish movements) that emerged from that period. In commenting on the Advent movement (which was a big part of that period) I said I had been born and raised in one of the denominations whose roots are in that movement. In fact, it is my view that many (if not most) American Evangelical groups today have some of their own roots buried deep within that exact same Advent movement.

Seventh-day Adventism is one of the denominations whose roots go back to the Advent movement of the Second Great Awakening. Many people do not know how to position this particular group; some insist it is a cult while others believe it to be part of mainline Evangelicalism. In this short piece, I want to look a little more closely at that denomination – not so much for labelling purposes – I’ll leave that up to the reader. Quite frankly, I don’t find the SDA church to be a great deal different than many other mainline Evangelical groups. Their core beliefs, with regard to what makes one Christian, are very similar if not the same. However, they do have a few unique beliefs and differ somewhat from the majority view (in mainline Protestantism) on several doctrinal issues.

Therefore my goal here is to explore some of those differences and examine their distinctives and belief system a little more closely. I also want to look at possible reasons why many, who leave the SDA denomination, avoid membership with other Protestant churches and many choose to abandon Christianity altogether. In my own case for example, I left and did not attend church again for roughly 35 years. It has only been 12 years now that I have been regularly attending church and consider myself Christian.

To be a member of the SDA church, one must be baptized and upon one’s baptism they are then voted into membership. Baptism is by full immersion and is what is commonly called, “Believers Baptism.”

The Seventh-day Adventist baptismal vow is a list of 13 belief statements which a person joining the Seventh-day Adventist Church is given and accepts at believer's baptism. In Adventist understanding, baptism (a public display of faith in Christ), is associated with officially joining the Adventist church, which is a part of the community of believers in Christ. The vow is explained in the church manual. In 2005 an alternate vow consisting of three statements was approved at the General Conference Session, and the baptizing pastor now has a choice of which set to use.” [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventist_Baptismal_Vow]

The one being baptized would affirm each statement in the vow as it is read to them. The actual vows are available at the end of this essay (see appendix 1). The baptismal vow is said to complement the 28 Fundamental beliefs of the church.

When I look at the practice of baptism as mentioned in the New Testament, I see nothing about taking a specific vow or commitment to a particular church organization. What I do see in the text is: repent, be cleansed of one’s sin, a confession of belief in Christ as one’s personal saviour and the desire to be born again into His Kingdom. The text does say that through this confession and baptism, we are born into one body and filled with one spirit.

However, the idea of making a public confession or declaration can be seen in 1 Timothy 6:12 which says: “Fight the good fight of the faith. Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called when you made your good confession in the presence of many witnesses.” The practice of baptismal confession finds its historical roots in the creeds of the Christian Church including, “The Apostles Creed.” Tertullian (one of the Church fathers) describes the baptismal vow as practised in his day: "When we are going to enter the water, but a little before, in the presence of the congregation and under the hand of the president, we solemnly profess that we disown the devil, and his pomp, and his angels."[https://www.tertullian.org/anf/anf03/anf03-10.htm#P1035_422175, chapter III]

It is generally acknowledged that public confession at baptism has been practised throughout the history of the Christian Church. However, the SDA vows (as will be noted) appear to have added an element of denominationalism to them and particular doctrinal beliefs that I do not see in the scriptural texts concerning baptism.

The vows in question, make reference to the fundamental beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. In order to understand what is being stated, those twenty-eight beliefs or statements will be included at the end of this essay (see appendix 2). The full statement was taken from a 2020 Copyright statement from the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists [https://www.adventist.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ADV-28Beliefs2020.pdf].



Differences and Distinctives: At this point, I now would like to highlight and examine apparent differences and distinctives. Many teachings are thought (by some) to be exclusively held by Seventh-day Adventists. This idea however, needs to be more carefully examined. In fact, some of their doctrinal positions (which many think of as exclusive) are not. While those positions may be the minority or less popular view, they are held in common with other denominations and scholars within the broader Christian church.

“Adventists” (which is the term most often used to refer to themselves) actually have very few doctrines that are truly unique or exclusive. In general terms, Adventists agree with many Catholic and Protestant doctrines, including the Trinity, Christ's divinity, the Virgin birth, the atonement, a physical resurrection of the dead and Christ's Second Coming. They believe in inherited sin nature and reject the Evangelical teaching that one can never lose one's salvation no matter what one does (i.e. they reject "once saved, always saved). However, one of their most notable positions is the degree of their “Biblical Literalism” and legalism. Generally, if the verses can have a literal meaning then that is the belief that they take.

Some distinctive doctrines of the Seventh-Day Adventist church (which differentiate it from other Christian churches) include: the perpetuity of the seventh-day Sabbath, the state of unconsciousness in death, conditional immortality, an atoning ministry of Jesus Christ in the heavenly sanctuary, and an 'investigative judgment' that commenced in 1844. Furthermore, a traditionally historicist approach to prophecy has led Adventists to develop a unique system of eschatological beliefs which incorporates a commandment-keeping 'remnant', a universal end-time crisis (revolving around the law of God), and the visible return of Jesus Christ prior to a millennial reign of believers in heaven.

The following list covers the SDA position on twelve topics that some in the Christian world might view as heterodox and therefore cultish. Whether or not they are, I shall leave up to the reader to decide.

1. - Baptism:

I’ve already mentioned this topic. What I would add here is that it is generally accepted that the SDA church practices a valid form of baptism also found in many other Evangelical churches. When a person comes from another denomination, as long as the baptism was “believers baptism” and by full immersion, the Adventist denomination will accept it as valid; the reverse is true as well. I like the way one commentator put it in the following quote:

Unlike JW and Mormons, Seventh-day Adventists by virtue of their valid baptism and their belief in Christ's divinity and the doctrine of Trinity, are considered ontologically and theologically closer to mainstream Christians.” [https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/16239/what-are-the-main-differences-between-7th-day-adventists-and-catholic-protestant]

2. - Seventh-day Sabbath (Saturday worship):

This is probably the Adventist characteristic most questioning people would see as unique (some would even go as far as thinking it strange). Saturday worship is indeed unusual among a great many Christians but it is not unique. There are a significant number of denominations, as well as independent churches that attend church on Saturday. Some do so as part of the practice of following Jewish practice and/or Hebrew roots and others see it as still being relevant and required under the Old Testament covenant. What is perhaps a bit more unique about SDA worship on Saturday is that they hold the counting of days as being sundown to sundown – therefore sabbath begins at sundown Friday evening until sundown Saturday evening.

3. - A Universal End-time Crisis Revolving Around the Law of God:

As part of their end-time view, they believe the true people of God (those who endure and will be saved), will be found to be keeping all the ten commandments with a special emphasis on the 4th or Sabbath commandment. Just before Christ returns in the Second Coming, those who are faithful in keeping the sabbath commandment will go through a time of tribulation.

A passage they frequently preach from and point to is what they refer to as “The three Angels Message” and is taken from Revelation 14:6-12. This passage, among other things, mentions the, “mark of the beast,” It ends in verse 12 with, “Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” They take this to mean the mark of the faithful will be keeping to the seventh-day sabbath. They believe the Beast is the papacy while the “mark of the beast,” will be those observing Sunday as their day-of-rest.

Sounds a bit bizarre and perhaps even somewhat unorthodox. However, the idea that the pope is the beast and the Roman Catholic Church is the woman riding the beast aka “Babylon,” is not unique and goes back to the Protestant Reformation. There have also been many other bizarre theories as to what “the mark” might be. Evangelicals have claimed everything from credit cards, to bar-codes, to the latest round of the so called “vaccines,” are possibly the mark of the beast.

4. - Mortalism or The Unconscious State of the Dead:

The Adventist view of the intermediate state (between death and the Second Coming of Christ) is that the dead are asleep until called forth for the Resurrection. Many might see this as a unique and possibly cultish view but such is not the case. Christian mortalism is the Christian belief that the human soul is not naturally immortal - and may include the belief that the soul is "sleeping" after death until the Resurrection of the Dead and the Last Judgment. This is a time period more commonly known as the intermediate state. This view, while it seems to be a minority view, has been held my many Christians over the centuries. There are also a number of present day Bible scholars that affirm or seem to affirm this position.

Rather than getting into too much more detail on this doctrine, allow me to share a couple quotes to help sum things up:

For mortalists the Bible did not teach the existence of a separate immaterial or immortal soul and the word 'soul' simply meant 'life'; the doctrine of a separate soul was said to be a Platonic importation, [Thomson (2008), Bodies of thought: science, religion, and the soul in the early Enlightenment, p. 42]

Quoting from an article in Wikipedia on, “Christian mortalism.”

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_mortalism#Modern_scholarship] The article goes on at some length and concludes with the following two paragraphs. (note: The article has numerous links to references which the reader is invited to follow to delve into the topic further.)

The mortalist disbelief in the existence of a naturally immortal soul,[1][220] is affirmed as biblical teaching by a range of standard scholarly Jewish and Christian sources. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Modern Christian Thought (1995) says, "There is no concept of an immortal soul in the Old Testament, nor does the New Testament ever call the human soul immortal."[221] Harper's Bible Dictionary (1st ed. 1985) says that "For a Hebrew, 'soul' indicated the unity of a human person; Hebrews were living bodies, they did not have bodies".[222] Cressey 1996 says, "But to the Bible man is not a soul in a body but a body/soul unity".[223] Avery-Peck 2000 says, "Scripture does not present even a rudimentarily developed theology of the soul"[224] and "The notion of the soul as an independent force that animates human life but that can exist apart from the human body—either prior to conception and birth or subsequent to life and death—is the product only of later Judaism".[225] The New Dictionary of Theology says that the Septuagint translated the Hebrew word nefesh by the Greek word psyche, but the latter does not have the same sense in Greek thought.[226] The Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible, 2000 says, "Far from referring simply to one aspect of a person, "soul" refers to the whole person".[227] The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia says, "Possibly Jn. 6:33 also includes an allusion to the general life-giving function. This teaching rules out all ideas of an emanation of the soul."[228] and "The soul and the body belong together, so that without either the one or the other there is no true man".[229] The Eerdmans Bible Dictionary, 1987 says, "Indeed, the salvation of the "immortal soul" has sometimes been a commonplace in preaching, but it is fundamentally unbiblical."[203] The Encyclopedia of Christianity, 2003 says "The Hebrew Bible does not present the human soul (nepeš) or spirit (rûah) as an immortal substance, and for the most part it envisions the dead as ghosts in Sheol, the dark, sleepy underworld".[230] The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 2005 says, "there is practically no specific teaching on the subject in the Bible beyond an underlying assumption of some form of afterlife (see immortality)".[231] The Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (rev ed.), 2009 says "It is this essential soul-body oneness that provides the uniqueness of the biblical concept of the resurrection of the body as distinguished from the Greek idea of the immortality of the soul".[232]

The mortalist disbelief in the existence of a naturally immortal soul[1][233] is also affirmed as biblical teaching by various modern theologians,[234][235][236][e][238][239][240] and Hebblethwaite observes the doctrine of immortality of the soul is "not popular amongst Christian theologians or among Christian philosophers today".[241][242]

5. - Conditional immortality or Annihilationism:

In Christianity, this view can also be referred to as extinctionism or destructionism and it is directly related to Christian conditionalism (the idea that a human soul is not immortal unless given eternal life by God). Annihilationism asserts that God will destroy and cremate the wicked, leaving only the righteous to live on in immortality. Thus those who do not repent of their sins are eventually destroyed because of the incompatibility of sin with God's holy character. Annihilationism stands in contrast to both the belief in eternal torment and to the universalist belief that everyone will be saved. However, it is also possible to hold to a partial annihilationism, believing unsaved humans to be obliterated, but demonic beings to suffer forever.

This is one of the views that I believe the SDA church has gotten correct. While a minority view amongst Christians, it is a view held by a number of denominations and a number of scholars. This is a topic I have already written about in some detail and therefore I will only add a brief quote to the above:

Other supporters have included Charles Frederic Hudson (1860), Edward White (1878), Emmanuel Petavel-Olliff (1836–1910, in 1889) and others.[49] Early Pentecostal pioneer Charles Fox Parham taught annihilationism...

Annihilationism seems to be gaining as a legitimate minority opinion within modern, conservative Protestant theology since the 1960s, and particularly since the 1980s. It has found support and acceptance among some British evangelicals, although it is viewed with greater suspicion by their American counterparts. Recently, a handful of evangelical theologians, including the prominent evangelical Anglican author John Stott, have offered at least tentative support for the doctrine, touching off a heated debate within mainstream evangelical Christianity.” [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilationism]

6. - Ellen G White and the Spirit of Prophecy:

Ellen G. White is one of the co-founders of the Seventh-day Adventist church. Adventists believe her to have been a prophetess (an expression of the New Testament spiritual gift of prophecy). They do not believe her writings are on par with scripture but say the final and ultimate authority belongs to the Bible alone. It is noteworthy that some of her declarations and writings have been shown as incorrect or to have failed.

I do not subscribe to the “prophetic” teachings of Ellen G White. However, I must note there are many other so called “prophets” to be found within the current Evangelical movement – particularly within the charismatic wing. I’m also am very skeptical of these individuals as well and have noted a great many of their prophecies and predictions have failed as well.

7. - The Atoning Ministry of Jesus Christ in the Heavenly Sanctuary:

The heavenly sanctuary teaching claims that many aspects of the Hebrew tabernacle or sanctuary are representative of heavenly realities. Based on their understanding of Hebrews 4:14-15, they teach that Jesus is the High Priest who provides atonement for human sins by the sacrificial shedding of his blood at Calvary. This particular understanding or doctrinal view is unique to Seventh-day Adventism.

Other denominations share many similar views with respect to the book of Hebrews (eg. Hebrews 8:2). However, one thing completely unique to Adventism is the belief that the day of atonement is a foreshadowing of the “investigative judgment.” In SDA theology, the "heavenly sanctuary" is usually a term which also can include something they call, “the investigative judgment.” Adventists hold that Christ's ministry in heaven, prior to the beginning of this “investigative judgment,” was the Atoning ministry in the Heavenly Sanctuary and what is being referenced in Daniel 8:14. The Atoning ministry and the investigative judgment are frequently spoken of together.

This doctrine is uniquely Adventist and one which I personally do not believe is supported in the scriptures.

8. - Investigative Judgment:

Referenced in the above point, the investigative judgment theory is a unique SDA doctrine. When Christ did not return in 1844 as the Millerite followers had predicted, those who persisted in the belief, that the date was prophetically significant, decided they had the right date but the wrong event. With time, the theory that emerged is that Jesus had entered the most Holy place in the Heavenly temple (rather than return to earth) to begin a process of judgment. They believe this to be the “cleansing of the sanctuary.” In my opinion, of all the SDA beliefs that might be seen as cultish, this would seem to top the list.

The theory behind the doctrine is complicated and the reasoning is convoluted at times. The scriptural texts they draw on in support of the theory I believe are used out of context and it seems the idea is read into the text rather than derived from it. If someone wants to study it in more detail there are plenty of articles one can access on line. Here is a good general description from Wikipedia which can serve as a brief summary:

The investigative judgment, or pre-Advent Judgment (or, more accurately the pre-Second Advent Judgment), is a unique Seventh-day Adventist doctrine, which asserts that the divine judgment of professed Christians has been in progress since 1844. It is intimately related to the history of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and was described by one of the church's pioneers Ellen G. White as one of the pillars of Adventist belief. It is a major component of the broader Adventist understanding of the "heavenly sanctuary", and the two are sometimes spoken of interchangeably.” [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigative_judgment]

The Investigative Judgment doctrine is also uniquely Adventist and one which I personally do not believe is supported in the scriptures.

9. - Historicist approach to Prophecy:

The Historicist approach is one of several different approaches taken in attempting to interpret or understand Bible prophecy – especially as it seems to be pointing toward the Eschaton. At one point in history it was the method most often used - though not exclusively. In the last century or so, futurism has become the more dominant method used. The following description is from “gotquestions.org” [https://www.gotquestions.org/historicism-historicist.html]

In theology, historicism is an approach to eschatology and prophecy in general. In historicism biblical prophecies are interpreted as representative of literal historical events. Historicism looks at the whole of Bible prophecy as a sweeping overview of church history, from Pentecost to the end times. This approach involves interpreting symbols or figures in the Bible as metaphors for actual events, nations, or persons of history. Historicism was especially popular during the Reformation, when it was used to suggest that the Catholic Church was part of the end-times apostasy, with the pope as the Antichrist.

Historicism is distinguished from other views of eschatology: idealism (the events of Revelation are entirely symbolic of the cosmic struggle between good and evil); preterism (the events of Revelation were fulfilled in AD 70); and futurism (the events of Revelation await a future, end-times fulfillment during the tribulation and beyond). Historicism falls between preterism and futurism in its approach: according to historicism, most of Revelation is symbolic of persons and events in world history. The book of Revelation was prophecy when John wrote it, according to historicists, but most of the book has already been fulfilled in our day.

Here are some examples of how historicism usually interprets events in Revelation: the seven churches in Revelation 2–3 are symbolic of seven ages of church history, starting with the apostolic church (the church of Ephesus) and ending with the modern-day, lukewarm church (the church of Laodicea). The seals in chapters 4—7 represent the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. The “little scroll” given to John in chapter 10 is a picture of the Protestant Reformation. The beasts of chapters 12 and 13 represent Catholicism and the papacy. Other passages in Revelation are linked to the invasion of the Huns, the spread of Islam, and the rise of the modern missionary movement.”

10. - Visible return of Jesus Christ Prior to the Millennium:

This is one of several views of the second coming of Christ held by many Christians that do not hold to a “Secret Rapture” view. This view seems to fit a straight forward reading of all scriptural passages referring to the Parusia.

11. - Millennium:

Adventist eschatology holds that the Millennium will be in Heaven. The so called “pit” (where the devil and his angels are bound) will be this desolate and deserted earth. At its close, Christ along with the saints and the Holy city will descend from heaven to earth. The unrighteous dead will be resurrected and will surround the city along with Satan and his angels. Then fire from God will consume them and cleanse the earth. The universe will thus be freed of sin and sinners forever.

12. - Commandment Keeping Remnant church:

Seventh-day Adventists believe they are the “Remnant church” the sign of which is the keeping of the “Ten Commandments” (with particular emphasis on the 4th or “sabbath” commandment).



Now that I’ve looked at denominational differences, I would like to cogitate on possible reasons why many of those who leave the SDA denomination, avoid attending and joining other Protestant churches. A significant number who leave choose to abandon Christianity altogether. For example, in my own case when I left, I did not attend church again for roughly 35 years. It has only been 12 years now that I have been regularly attending church and consider myself Christian. During this time, I have not sought membership with any church even though I am a “believer” and attend church services regularly.

I do not believe most who leave do so because of the majority of doctrinal differences. For instance, people don’t leave because they should worship on Sunday rather than Saturday or because they think the Millennium is to be on Earth rather than Heaven. However, I do think some of the distinctives do play a very major role in their avoidance of other Christian churches – even though they may be largely unconscious of that role. In my opinion, points 2, 6, and 12 from the above listing come strongly into play when deciding, “where to now?”

Having basically come out of the Second Great Awakening (from largely within the Advent movement) the SDA church was also heavily influenced by the other two component movements within that “awakening” period. Both the “Holiness Movement” and the “The Restoration Movement” has significant impact on the evolving Seventh-day Adventist church.

Restorationism holds the view that the early beliefs and practices of Jesus followers were either lost or adulterated after his time here on earth. The attempt then becomes one of restoring those beliefs and practices. After they believed they had gotten everything restored, we then arrive at the doctrine of the “Remnant Church.” Couple that with “a prophet” to help guide in the restoration process and add the Holiness desire of sinless perfection and what emerges is the foundation of what we see today.

The Seventh-day Adventist denomination not only attends church on Saturday, it also has many strict rules and expectations as to how that day is to be kept. This even includes knowing the sunset times on Friday when it begins and Saturday when it ends. “Sabbath keeping,” as it is called is seen as the true mark of the “Remnant Church” while Sunday worship is seen as something instituted by the Roman Catholic Church and is considered as the “Mark of the Beast.” It is almost unthinkable for someone raised as an Adventist to consider attending church on Sunday. When I first began going to church after about a 35 year absence, I felt very strange and somewhat uncomfortable when I started attending Sunday services. To this day I still do not see Sunday as anything other than just another day.

Adventists, with dogma rooted in some of the Holiness groups, believe in a near Hebraic view of the law as being pertinent for today, and expect their adherents to obey certain behavioural rules. Consequently, church members readily apply Scriptural lifestyle commands to their lives, and view them as generally binding today. They apply these principles in many different ways. Their members are expected to live modest lives, with a strict code of ethics. They don't smoke or drink alcohol, and recommend a vegetarian diet. Meat is permitted, but only following the Biblical commandments on clean and unclean food. They are expected to dress modestly and not wear make-up or jewellery; they are to refrain from dancing or listening to inappropriate, “worldly” music .

In John 6: 66-68 We read of a time when many of the disciples of Jesus walked away and stopped following Him. Here is how it reads: (ESV) “After this many of his disciples turned back and no longer walked with him. So Jesus said to the twelve, “Do you want to go away as well?” Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life,”

Just like the above passage from John, it is my opinion that for many former Adventists they can not see any viable options. It is my suspicion that when someone raised in the SDA church leaves, whether or not they realize it, they carry with them those tapes and doctrinal ideas they thought they left behind. Without realizing it, I think many have been so well conditioned that they have come to think of the SDA church as their only truly Christian choice. For many, leaving Adventism is almost the same as denouncing Christianity. The teaching around the, “Commandment Keeping Remnant Church,” has been accepted to the extent that all other choices would seem akin to choosing Babylon... after all if you leave the “Remnant Church,” what’s left?

Appendix 1: The following vow which is from the Sixth Business Meeting of the 57th General Conference Session, July 3, 2000:

[https://web.archive.org/web/20121203083208/http://www.adventistreview.org/2000-bulletin7/actions-proceedings.html]

Baptismal Vow #1

1. Do you believe there is one God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, a unity of three coeternal Persons?

2. Do you accept the death of Jesus Christ on Calvary as the atoning sacrifice for your sins and believe that by God’s grace through faith in His shed blood you are saved from sin and its penalty?

3. Do you accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and personal Saviour believing that God, in Christ, has forgiven your sins and given you a new heart, and do you renounce the sinful ways of the world?

4. Do you accept by faith the righteousness of Christ, your Intercessor in the heavenly sanctuary, and accept His promise of transforming grace and power to live a loving, Christ-centred life in your home and before the world?

5. Do you believe that the Bible is God’s inspired Word, the only rule of faith and practice for the Christian? Do you covenant to spend time regularly in prayer and Bible study?

6. Do you accept the Ten Commandments as a transcript of the character of God and a revelation of His will? Is it your purpose by the power of the indwelling Christ to keep this law, including the fourth commandment, which requires the observance of the seventh day of the week as the Sabbath of the Lord and the memorial of Creation?

7. Do you look forward to the soon coming of Jesus and the blessed hope when “this mortal shall . . . put on immortality”? As you prepare to meet the Lord, will you witness to His loving salvation by using your talents in personal soul-winning endeavor to help others to be ready for His glorious appearing?

8. Do you accept the biblical teaching of spiritual gifts and believe that the gift of prophecy is one of the identifying marks of the remnant church?

9. Do you believe in church organization? Is it your purpose to worship God and to support the church through your tithes and offerings and by your personal effort and influence?

10. Do you believe that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit; and will you honor God by caring for it, avoiding the use of that which is harmful; abstaining from all unclean foods; from the use, manufacture, or sale of alcoholic beverages; the use, manufacture, or sale of tobacco in any of its forms for human consumption; and from the misuse of or trafficking in narcotics or other drugs?

11. Do you know and understand the fundamental Bible principles as taught by the Seventh-day Adventist Church? Do you purpose, by the grace of God, to fulfill His will by ordering your life in harmony with these principles?

12. Do you accept the New Testament teaching of baptism by immersion and desire to be so baptized as a public expression of faith in Christ and His forgiveness of your sins?

13. Do you accept and believe that the Seventh-day Adventist Church is the remnant church of Bible prophecy and that people of every nation, race, and language are invited and accepted into its fellowship? Do you desire to be a member of this local congregation of the world church?”

Baptismal Vow #2 An alternative baptismal vow was introduced and accepted in 2005. It consists of the following three affirmations:

1. Do you accept Jesus Christ as your personal Savior and Lord, and do you desire to live your life in a saving relationship with Him?

2. Do you accept the teachings of the Bible as expressed in the Statement of Fundamental Beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and do you pledge by God’s grace to live your life in harmony with these teachings?

3. Do you desire to be baptized as a public expression of your belief in Jesus Christ, to be accepted into the fellowship of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, and to support the church and its mission as a faithful steward by your personal influence, tithes and offerings, and a life of service?” [https://archive.ph/20130817235255/http://news.adventist.org/en/archive/articles/2005/07/08/delegates-debate-baptismal-vows]



Appendix 2: The vows also make reference to the fundamental beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. In order to understand what is being stated, here are those twenty-eight beliefs or statements from a 2020 Copyright statement from the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists [https://www.adventist.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ADV-28Beliefs2020.pdf].



The Twenty-eight Fundamental Beliefs

1 The Holy Scriptures: The Holy Scriptures, Old and New Testaments, are the written Word of God, given by divine inspiration. The inspired authors spoke and wrote as they were moved by the Holy Spirit. In this Word, God has committed to humanity the knowledge necessary for salvation. The Holy Scriptures are the supreme, authoritative, and the infallible revelation of His will. They are the standard of character, the test of experience, the definitive revealer of doctrines, and the trustworthy record of God’s acts in history.

2 The Trinity: There is one God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, a unity of three coeternal Persons. God is immortal, all-powerful, all-knowing, above all, and ever present. He is infinite and beyond human comprehension, yet known through His self-revelation. God, who is love, is forever worthy of worship, adoration, and service by the whole creation.

3 The Father: God the eternal Father is the Creator, Source, Sustainer, and Sovereign of all creation. He is just and holy, merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness. The qualities and powers exhibited in the Son and the Holy Spirit are also those of the Father.

4 The Son: God the eternal Son became incarnate in Jesus Christ. Through Him all things were created, the character of God is revealed, the salvation of humanity is accomplished, and the world is judged. Forever truly God, He became also truly human, Jesus the Christ. He was conceived of the Holy Spirit and born of the virgin Mary. He lived and experienced temptation as a human being, but perfectly exemplified the righteousness and love of God. By His miracles He manifested God’s power and was attested as God’s promised Messiah. He suffered and died voluntarily on the cross for our sins and in our place, was raised from the dead, and ascended to heaven {to minister in the heavenly sanctuary in our behalf.} He will come again in glory for the final deliverance of His people and the restoration of all things.

5 The Holy Spirit: God the eternal Spirit was active with the Father and the Son in Creation, incarnation, and redemption. He is as much a person as are the Father and the Son. He inspired the writers of Scripture. He filled Christ’s life with power. He draws and convicts human beings; and those who respond He renews and transforms into the image of God.

Sent by the Father and the Son to be always with His children, He extends spiritual gifts to the church, empowers it to bear witness to Christ, and in harmony with the Scriptures leads it into all truth.

6 Creation: God has revealed in Scripture the authentic and historical account of His creative activity. He created the universe, and in a recent six-day creation the Lord made “the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them” and rested on the seventh day. Thus He established the Sabbath as a perpetual memorial of the work He performed and completed during six literal days that together with the Sabbath constituted the same unit of time that we call a week today.

The first man and woman were made in the image of God as the crowning work of Creation, given dominion over the world, and charged with responsibility to care for it. When the world was finished it was “very good,” declaring the glory of God.

7 The Nature of Humanity: Man and woman were made in the image of God with individuality, the power and freedom to think and to do. Though created free beings, each is an indivisible unity of body, mind, and spirit, dependent upon God for life and breath and all else. When our first parents disobeyed God, they denied their dependence upon Him and fell from their high position. The image of God in them was marred and they became subject to death. Their descendants share this fallen nature and its consequences. They are born with weaknesses and tendencies to evil. But God in Christ reconciled the world to Himself and by His Spirit restores in penitent mortals the image of their Maker. Created for the glory of God, they are called to love Him and one another, and to care for their environment.

8 The Great Controversy: All humanity is now involved in a great controversy between Christ and Satan regarding the character of God, His law, and His sovereignty over the universe. This conflict originated in heaven when a created being, endowed with freedom of choice, in self-exaltation became Satan, God’s adversary, and led into rebellion a portion of the angels. He introduced the spirit of rebellion into this world when he led Adam and Eve into sin. This human sin resulted in the distortion of the image of God in humanity, the disordering of the created world, and its eventual devastation at the time of the global flood, as presented in the historical account of Genesis 1-11. Observed by the whole creation, this world became the arena of the universal conflict, out of which the God of love will ultimately be vindicated. To assist His people in this controversy, Christ sends the Holy Spirit and the loyal angels to guide, protect, and sustain them in the way of salvation.

9 The Life, Death, and Resurrection of Christ: In Christ’s life of perfect obedience to God’s will, His suffering, death, and resurrection, God provided the only means of atonement for human sin, so that those who by faith accept this atonement may have eternal life, and the whole creation may better understand the infinite and holy love of the Creator. This perfect atonement vindicates the righteousness of God’s law and the graciousness of His character; for it both condemns our sin and provides for our forgiveness. The death of Christ is substitutionary and expiatory, reconciling and transforming. The bodily resurrection of Christ proclaims God’s triumph over the forces of evil, and for those who accept the atonement assures their final victory over sin and death. It declares the Lordship of Jesus Christ, before whom every knee in heaven and on earth will bow.

10 The Experience of Salvation: In infinite love and mercy God made Christ, who knew no sin, to be sin for us, so that in Him we might be made the righteousness of God. Led by the Holy Spirit we sense our need, acknowledge our sinfulness, repent of our transgressions, and exercise faith in Jesus as Saviour and Lord, Substitute and Example. This saving faith comes through the divine power of the Word and is the gift of God’s grace. Through Christ we are justified, adopted as God’s sons and daughters, and delivered from the lordship of sin. Through the Spirit we are born again and sanctified; the Spirit renews our minds, writes God’s law of love in our hearts, and we are given the power to live a holy life. Abiding in Him we become partakers of the divine nature and have the assurance of salvation now and in the judgment.

11 Growing in Christ: By His death on the cross Jesus triumphed over the forces of evil. He who subjugated the demonic spirits during His earthly ministry has broken their power and made certain their ultimate doom. Jesus’ victory gives us victory over the evil forces that still seek to control us, as we walk with Him in peace, joy, and assurance of His love. Now the Holy Spirit dwells within us and empowers us. Continually committed to Jesus as our Saviour and Lord, we are set free from the burden of our past deeds. No longer do we live in the darkness, fear of evil powers, ignorance, and meaninglessness of our former way of life. In this new freedom in Jesus, we are called to grow into the likeness of His character, communing with Him daily in prayer, feeding on His Word, meditating on it and on His providence, singing His praises, gathering together for worship, and participating in the mission of the Church. We are also called to follow Christ’s example by compassionately ministering to the physical, mental, social, emotional, and spiritual needs of humanity. As we give ourselves in loving service to those around us and in witnessing to His salvation, His constant presence with us through the Spirit transforms every moment and every task into a spiritual experience.

12 The Church: The church is the community of believers who confess Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour. In continuity with the people of God in Old Testament times, we are called out from the world; and we join together for worship, for fellowship, for instruction in the Word, for the celebration of the Lord’s Supper, for service to humanity, and for the worldwide proclamation of the gospel. The church derives its authority from Christ, who is the incarnate Word revealed in the Scriptures. The church is God’s family; adopted by Him as children, its members live on the basis of the new covenant. The church is the body of Christ, a community of faith of which Christ Himself is the Head. The church is the bride for whom Christ died that He might sanctify and cleanse her. At His return in triumph, He will present her to Himself a glorious church, the faithful of all the ages, the purchase of His blood, not having spot or wrinkle, but holy and without blemish.

13 The Remnant and Its Mission: The universal church is composed of all who truly believe in Christ, but in the last days, a time of widespread apostasy, a remnant has been called out to keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus. This remnant announces the arrival of the judgment hour, proclaims salvation through Christ, and heralds the approach of His second advent. This proclamation is symbolized by the three angels of Revelation 14; it coincides with the work of judgment in heaven and results in a work of repentance and reform on earth. Every believer is called to have a personal part in this worldwide witness.

14 Unity in the Body of Christ: The church is one body with many members, called from every nation, kindred, tongue, and people. In Christ we are a new creation; distinctions of race, culture, learning, and nationality, and differences between high and low, rich and poor, male and female, must not be divisive among us. We are all equal in Christ, who by one Spirit has bonded us into one fellowship with Him and with one another; we are to serve and be served without partiality or reservation. Through the revelation of Jesus Christ in the Scriptures we share the same faith and hope, and reach out in one witness to all. This unity has its source in the oneness of the triune God, who has adopted us as His children.

15 Baptism: By baptism we confess our faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, and testify of our death to sin and of our purpose to walk in newness of life. Thus we acknowledge Christ as Lord and Saviour, become His people, and are received as members by His church. Baptism is a symbol of our union with Christ, the forgiveness of our sins, and our reception of the Holy Spirit. It is by immersion in water and is contingent on an affirmation of faith in Jesus and evidence of repentance of sin. It follows instruction in the Holy Scriptures and acceptance of their teachings.

16 The Lord’s Supper: The Lord’s Supper is a participation in the emblems of the body and blood of Jesus as an expression of faith in Him, our Lord and Saviour. In this experience of communion Christ is present to meet and strengthen His people. As we partake, we joyfully proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes again. Preparation for the Supper includes self-examination, repentance, and confession. The Master ordained the service of foot-washing to signify renewed cleansing, to express a willingness to serve one another in Christlike humility, and to unite our hearts in love. The communion service is open to all believing Christians.

17 Spiritual Gifts and Ministries: God bestows upon all members of His church in every age spiritual gifts that each member is to employ in loving ministry for the common good of the church and of humanity. Given by the agency of the Holy Spirit, who apportions to each member as He wills, the gifts provide all abilities and ministries needed by the church to fulfill its divinely ordained functions. According to the Scriptures, these gifts include such ministries as faith, healing, prophecy, proclamation, teaching, administration, reconciliation, compassion, and self-sacrificing service and charity for the help and encouragement of people. Some members are called of God and endowed by the Spirit for functions recognized by the church in pastoral, evangelistic, and teaching ministries particularly needed to equip the members for service, to build up the church to spiritual maturity, and to foster unity of the faith and knowledge of God.

When members employ these spiritual gifts as faithful stewards of God’s varied grace, the church is protected from the destructive influence of false doctrine, grows with a growth that is from God, and is built up in faith and love.

18 The Gift of Prophecy: The Scriptures testify that one of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is prophecy. This gift is an identifying mark of the remnant church and we believe it was manifested in the ministry of Ellen G. White. Her writings speak with prophetic authority and provide comfort, guidance, instruction, and correction to the church. They also make clear that the Bible is the standard by which all teaching and experience must be tested.

19 The Law of God: The great principles of God’s law are embodied in the Ten Commandments and exemplified in the life of Christ. They express God’s love, will, and purposes concerning human conduct and relationships and are binding upon all people in every age. These precepts are the basis of God’s covenant with His people and the standard in God’s judgment. Through the agency of the Holy Spirit they point out sin and awaken a sense of need for a Saviour. Salvation is all of grace and not of works, and its fruit is obedience to the Commandments. This obedience develops Christian character and results in a sense of well-being. It is evidence of our love for the Lord and our concern for our fellow human beings. The obedience of faith demonstrates the power of Christ to transform lives, and therefore strengthens Christian witness.

20 The Sabbath: The gracious Creator, after the six days of Creation, rested on the seventh day and instituted the Sabbath for all people as a memorial of Creation. The fourth commandment of God’s unchangeable law requires the observance of this seventh-day Sabbath as the day of rest, worship, and ministry in harmony with the teaching and practice of Jesus, the Lord of the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a day of delightful communion with God and one another. It is a symbol of our redemption in Christ, a sign of our sanctification, a token of our allegiance, and a foretaste of our eternal future in God’s kingdom. The Sabbath is God’s perpetual sign of His eternal covenant between Him and His people. Joyful observance of this holy time from evening to evening, sunset to sunset, is a celebration of God’s creative and redemptive acts.

21 Stewardship: We are God’s stewards, entrusted by Him with time and opportunities, abilities and possessions, and the blessings of the earth and its resources. We are responsible to Him for their proper use. We acknowledge God’s ownership by faithful service to Him and our fellow human beings, and by returning tithe and giving offerings for the proclamation of His gospel and the support and growth of His church. Stewardship is a privilege given to us by God for nurture in love and the victory over selfishness and covetousness. Stewards rejoice in the blessings that come to others as a result of their faithfulness.

22 Christian Behavior: We are called to be a godly people who think, feel, and act in harmony with biblical principles in all aspects of personal and social life. For the Spirit to recreate in us the character of our Lord we involve ourselves only in those things that will produce Christlike purity, health, and joy in our lives. This means that our amusement and entertainment should meet the highest standards of Christian taste and beauty. While recognizing cultural differences, our dress is to be simple, modest, and neat, befitting those whose true beauty does not consist of outward adornment but in the imperishable ornament of a gentle and quiet spirit. It also means that because our bodies are the temples of the Holy Spirit, we are to care for them intelligently. Along with adequate exercise and rest, we are to adopt the most healthful diet possible and abstain from the unclean foods identified in the Scriptures. Since alcoholic beverages, tobacco, and the irresponsible use of drugs and narcotics are harmful to our bodies, we are to abstain from them as well. Instead, we are to engage in whatever brings our thoughts and bodies into the discipline of Christ, who desires our wholesomeness, joy, and goodness.

23 Marriage and the Family: Marriage was divinely established in Eden and affirmed by Jesus to be a lifelong union between a man and a woman in loving companionship. For the Christian a marriage commitment is to God as well as to the spouse, and should be entered into only between a man and a woman who share a common faith. Mutual love, honour, respect, and responsibility are the fabric of this relationship, which is to reflect the love, sanctity, closeness, and permanence of the relationship between Christ and His church. Regarding divorce, Jesus taught that the person who divorces a spouse, except for fornication, and marries another, commits adultery. Although some family relationships may fall short of the ideal, a man and a woman who fully commit themselves to each other in Christ through marriage may achieve loving unity through the guidance of the Spirit and the nurture of the church. God blesses the family and intends that its members shall assist each other toward complete maturity. Increasing family closeness is one of the earmarks of the final gospel message. Parents are to bring up their children to love and obey the Lord. By their example and their words they are to teach them that Christ is a loving, tender, and caring guide who wants them to become members of His body, the family of God which embraces both single and married persons.

24 Christ’s Ministry in the Heavenly Sanctuary: There is a sanctuary in heaven, the true tabernacle that the Lord set up and not humans. In it Christ ministers on our behalf, making available to believers the benefits of His atoning sacrifice offered once for all on the cross. At His ascension, He was inaugurated as our great High Priest and, began His intercessory ministry, which was typified by the work of the high priest in the holy place of the earthly sanctuary. In 1844, at the end of the prophetic period of 2300 days, He entered the second and last phase of His atoning ministry, which was typified by the work of the high priest in the most holy place of the earthly sanctuary. It is a work of investigative judgment which is part of the ultimate disposition of all sin, typified by the cleansing of the ancient Hebrew sanctuary on the Day of Atonement. In that typical service the sanctuary was cleansed with the blood of animal sacrifices, but the heavenly things are purified with the perfect sacrifice of the blood of Jesus. The investigative judgment reveals to heavenly intelligences who among the dead are asleep in Christ and therefore, in Him, are deemed worthy to have part in the first resurrection.

It also makes manifest who among the living are abiding in Christ, keeping the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus, and in Him, therefore, are ready for translation into His everlasting kingdom. This judgment vindicates the justice of God in saving those who believe in Jesus. It declares that those who have remained loyal to God shall receive the kingdom. The completion of this ministry of Christ will mark the close of human probation before the Second Advent.

25 The Second Coming of Christ: The second coming of Christ is the blessed hope of the church, the grand climax of the gospel. The Saviour’s coming will be literal, personal, visible, and worldwide. When He returns, the righteous dead will be resurrected, and together with the righteous living will be glorified and taken to heaven, but the unrighteous will die. The almost complete fulfillment of most lines of prophecy, together with the present condition of the world, indicates that Christ’s coming is near. The time of that event has not been revealed, and we are therefore exhorted to be ready at all times.

26 Death and Resurrection: The wages of sin is death. But God, who alone is immortal, will grant eternal life to His redeemed. Until that day death is an unconscious state for all people. When Christ, who is our life, appears, the resurrected righteous and the living righteous will be glorified and caught up to meet their Lord. The second resurrection, the resurrection of the unrighteous, will take place a thousand years later.

27 The Millennium and the End of Sin: The millennium is the thousand-year reign of Christ with His saints in heaven between the first and second resurrections. During this time the wicked dead will be judged; the earth will be utterly desolate, without living human inhabitants, but occupied by Satan and his angels. At its close Christ with His saints and the Holy City will descend from heaven to earth. The unrighteous dead will then be resurrected, and with Satan and his angels will surround the city; but fire from God will consume them and cleanse the earth. The universe will thus be freed of sin and sinners forever.

28 The New Earth: On the new earth, in which righteousness dwells, God will provide an eternal home for the redeemed and a perfect environment for everlasting life, love, joy, and learning in His presence. For here God Himself will dwell with His people, and suffering and death will have passed away. The great controversy will be ended, and sin will be no more. All things, animate and inanimate, will declare that God is love; and He shall reign forever. Amen.

Copyright © 2020, General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists”

Monday, September 16, 2024

Upon Which Rock?

When I began to write this essay, I had it in mind to look into various “Christian” movements arising during or soon after the 2nd Great Awakening. This would cover a historical period of roughly half a century - between approximately 1790 and 1840. I wanted to look at the various groups, organizations, and even cults that resulted from, or grew out of, this period. As I studied and researched these topics, it became apparent this would be a huge undertaking and much more than I could cover in this short article. While I will mention some of these subjects, it will barely scratch the surface. I will not be going into any degree of detail but rather suggest that these may be topics the reader might wish to research further. A part of my focus will be on the cultish developments stemming from this time period.

It seems there was a series of religious awakenings or revivals which began in the early 18th century. These revivals or movements are often identified and divided into four. A substantial number of today's evangelical denominations, religious movements, groups and even cults have roots that go back to movements rooted within that time period. I believe this is especially true of the span of time which has come to be called, “The Second Great Awakening.”

The Second Great Awakening was a Protestant religious revival during the late 18th to early 19th century in the United States. It spread religion through revivals and emotional preaching and sparked a number of reform movements. Revivals were a key part of the movement and attracted hundreds of converts to new Protestant denominations.”

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Great_Awakening#:~:text=The Second Great Awakening was,a number of reform movements.]

As I was researching ideas which arose as part of the 2nd awakening, I found some very mixed reviews with less than charitable comments. Allow me to quote just a couple:

Pr Mark Rogers [https://www.9marks.org/article/forgotten-real-revivals-of-the-second-great-awakening/] said of this period:

Many see the First Great Awakening as controlled, orderly, robustly theological, and Calvinistic, epitomized by the theology and leadership of Jonathan Edwards; conversely, the Second Great Awakening is viewed as emotional, wild, atheological, and Arminian, epitomized by frenzied camp meetings on the frontier or Charles Finney’s manipulative “new measures.” The First is seen as a genuine work of God, while the Second is described as a work of man-centered manipulation. The First is seen as revival, while the second as revivalism. These sharp contrasts fit when focusing on certain aspects of each era. But these generalizations neglect large and important spheres of the Second Great Awakening. By naming the entire movement a result of man-made revivalism, we fail to recognize many examples of true revival between 1798 and 1820 that we can rejoice in and learn from....”

and Dr. Stephen J. Nichols [https://tabletalkmagazine.com/article/2019/05/second-great-awakening/] said the following:

Princeton was born out of the revivals of the First Great Awakening. That leads us to ask what changed from the 1740s to the 1820s and beyond. The answer, as mentioned above, is that the theology changed. And when the theology changed, the preaching changed. And when the preaching changed, the results were injurious.

Revivals come during times of declension, times of “backsliding.” There was a hunger, a famine in the land. Along comes the unadorned preaching of the gospel. Along comes the nourishment of God’s Word through the ordinary means of the preaching of God’s Word, and the soul awakens to God. Revivals move from declension and great lows to ascension and great heights. That is what happened in the First Great Awakening as the Word was preached and the Spirit of God moved. It was God’s work.

The problem with the Second Great Awakening is that it took people in declension even further down. But the solution to our problem of sin and being under the wrath of God is not to depend on ourselves to inch our way back to God....”

Along with a spiritual hunger, several additional factors are thought to have been behind, and thus driving this awakening. Following the American Revolution (and the resulting emergence of a new country) there was a lot of uncertainty about the times we were living in and what we might expect next. Coupled with that uncertainty, there was a growing desire for what might be thought of as a more “pure” form of Christianity. Such a form would, in a way, be more primitive by its nature - reflecting more closely the early church that we read of in Acts 2.

Quoting from an article on the 2nd great awakening:

To immigrants in the early 19th century, the land in the United States seemed pristine, Edenic and undefiled – "the perfect place to recover pure, uncorrupted and original Christianity" – and the tradition-bound European churches seemed out of place in this new setting.”

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Great_Awakening#:~:text=The outpouring of religious fervor,the Latter Day Saint movement.]

Concurrently, in Britain and other western European countries, new movements were being seen as well – especially as certain restrictions were being lifted on religious freedom. For instance; the rejection of the doctrine of the Trinity and the pre-existence of Christ are features of something called “Socinianism.” Because of restrictions on religious freedom in Britain, those with unorthodox views (such as Socinianism) had generally remained within the mainstream, ‘accepted’ churches. However, in 1813 the “Doctrine of the Trinity Act” was passed and the penalties, for denying the Trinity, were removed.



So, out of all the above, several influential “New Movements” emerged that were either a part of, or followed directly on, the heels of the Second Great Awakening. From what I’ve studied, it seems those movements are usually divided (with a lot of overlap) into three categories:

1) The Restoration Movement,

2) The Holiness Movement, and

3) The Advent Movement.

It is my view that some combination of these three are very much present in many if not most denominations and sects today. Like any other time in history, what emerged from these movements was a real mixture and variety of outcomes. While some of the outcomes could be said to truly represent real positive revival (within segments of the church), not all were necessarily either “good” or desirable.

During this period, many new converts were added to the various Protestant denominations. At the same time a variety of new religious/spiritual groups also emerged – especially within the USA. It would be fair to say that not all outcomes were necessarily “good.” Frankly, some of these movements were quite cultish in nature – indeed, several groups (generally regarded as cults) did emerge and remnants of them remain to this present time.

It seems that often the determining factor (of whether or not a given religious group is actually a cult) depends on whether or not one happened to be a member of that group. This was of particular interest to me because the denomination I grew up in, and subsequently left, was sometimes labelled a cult – and that denomination seemed equally determined to show that they are not. So with respect to the so called “awakenings,” and especially the second one, there is no doubt that some of the distinctives and doctrines that emerged during this time period were/are perhaps peculiar. This, in and of itself, does not earn a group the title of cult – though it is often included in a larger list of characteristics by which cults are defined.



The thing about Cults: The word cult is often a pejorative or derogatory term in today’s English-speaking world. While there are actual definitions for the word, its use has often been subjective by the average layperson. When used as part of an ad hominem attack against groups with differing doctrines or practices, it can often mean nothing more than, “a religion I don't like.”

Beginning in the 1930s, cults became an object of sociological study within the context of the study of religious behaviour. Since the 1940s, the Christian counter-cult movement has opposed some sects and new religious movements, labelling them "cults" because of their unorthodox beliefs.” [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult]

Of course there are cults that are completely secular in nature. In fact there have been estimates that the numbers of cults around the world goes well into the thousands. Along with this fact, there is a strong secular anti-cult movement since the 1970s. They have been opposed to certain groups as a reaction to acts of violence and there has frequently been charges of cults practicing brainwashing. However, these secular cults are not the focus of this essay.

The following two paragraphs are from a Wikipedia article:

In the 1940s, the long-held opposition by some established Christian denominations to non-Christian religions, and supposedly heretical or counterfeit Christian sects, crystallized into a more organized Christian counter-cult movement in the United States. For those belonging to the movement, all religious groups claiming to be Christian, but deemed outside of Christian orthodoxy, were considered cults. Christian cults are new religious movements that have a Christian background but are considered to be theologically deviant by members of other Christian churches.” (emphasis added) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult]

Further on in the article we read:

The Christian counter cult movement asserts that Christian sects whose beliefs are partially or wholly not in accordance with the Bible are erroneous. It also states that a religious sect can be considered a cult if its beliefs involve a denial of what they view as any of the essential Christian teachings such as salvation, the Trinity, Jesus himself as a person, the ministry of Jesus, the miracles of Jesus, the crucifixion, the resurrection of Christ, the Second Coming, and the rapture.” (emphasis added) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult]

Other articles I’ve studied have various other criteria for classifying a Christian religious group as a cult… but from just these two paragraphs we’ve already got a significant list. The Christian counter cult movement asserts that cults are all those religious groups that claim to be Christian but hold beliefs:

  • deemed to be outside of Christian orthodoxy

  • with a Christian background but are, “considered to be theologically deviant by members of other Christian churches.”

The counter cult movement further asserts that the characteristics, that constitute a cult, are the denial of what are viewed as any of the “essential Christian teachings,” such as:

  • salvation

  • Trinity

  • Jesus himself as a person

  • the ministry of Jesus

  • the miracles of Jesus

  • the crucifixion

  • the resurrection of Christ

  • the Second Coming

  • the rapture (note* here they have split off the “rapture” from the “second coming.” Does this mean they consider any eschatological view which doesn’t hold to their particular view of the “parusia” as cultish?)

In an article on the CARM website, [https://carm.org/minor-groups-issues/cults-an-outline-analysis/] Matt Slick, President and Founder of the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry, answers the question, “What is a cult?” thusly:

Generally, it is a group that is unorthodox, esoteric, and has a devotion to a person, object, or a set of new ideas.

  1. New Teaching – has a new theology and doctrine.

  2. Only True Teaching – often considers traditional religious systems to be apostate and it alone possesses the complete truth.

  3. Strong Leadership – often an individual or small but powerful leadership group holds control of the group’s teachings and practices.

  4. Asset Acquirement – often requires tithing and/or property transfer to the religious system.

  5. Isolationist – to facilitate control over the members physically, intellectually, financially, and emotionally.

  6. Controlling – exercises control over the members. Sometimes this is through fear, threatening loss of salvation if you leave the group. Sometimes through indoctrination.

  7. Indoctrination – possesses methods to reinforce the cult’s beliefs and standards where opposing views are ridiculed and often misrepresented.

  8. Apocalyptic – to give the members a future focus and philosophical purpose in avoiding the apocalypse or being delivered through it.

  9. Experience – various practices including meditation, repetition of words and/or phrases, and ‘spiritual’ enlightenment with God are used as confirmation of their truth.

    1. Deprivation – sleep and food deprivation which weakens the will of the subject.

    2. This is uncommon, though practised by more severe cults.

  1. Persecution – predictions of being persecuted, often combined with claiming any opposing views demonstrated against them as a form of persecution.”


Christian scholar Walter Ralston Martin, defines Christian cults a little differently. In his influential book, “The Kingdom of the Cults” (1965), he cites as cults, groups that follow the personal interpretation of an individual, rather than the understanding of the Bible accepted by Nicene Christianity. By Nicene Christianity he is referencing those groups that do not hold to the Nicene creed. For this definition of cults, he provides as examples:

  • the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

  • Christian Science

  • Jehovah's Witnesses

  • Armstrongism

  • Theosophy

  • the Baháʼí Faith

  • Unitarian Universalism

  • Scientology

  • minor groups including various New Age and groups based on Eastern religions

  • Seventh-day Adventists – this is one of the denominations that are sometimes considered a cult by some “experts” but not by others.


Three Movements of the 2nd Great Awakening: At the beginning of this essay, I mentioned three movements that are generally associated with the second great awakening (Restorationism, Holiness movement, and Adventism). It would now be a good time to look a little more closely at those three movements:



Restorationism: Also known as Restitutionism or Christian primitivism, Restorationism is the view which holds that the early beliefs and practices of Jesus followers were either lost or adulterated after his time here on earth. Those seeking to correct such perceived faults and/or deficiencies based their views on their understanding of the “primitive” church. With this understanding in mind, they sought to promote this ideology in branches of Christianity other than their own. This pursuit, they believed, is required to restore the church.

Efforts to restore an earlier, purer form of Christianity are frequently a response to denominationalism. As Rubel Shelly put it, "the motive behind all restoration movements is to tear down the walls of separation by a return to the practice of the original, essential and universal features of the Christian religion.[“I Just Want to Be a Christian,” 20th Century Christian, Nashville, Tennessee 1984, ISBN 0-89098-021-7]

The relative importance given to the restoration ideal, and the extent to which the full restoration of the early church is believed to have been achieved varies among groups which hold to this ideal.

The term "Restorationism" as it is applied to the eras of the Great Awakenings, is used as a descriptive term for a wide range of unrelated Restorationist groups which formed during that period. Groups such as noted in the following list are just a few of those with roots in this era:

  • Churches of Christ

  • Christian churches and churches of Christ

  • Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)

  • Latter Day Saint movement (including Mormonism)

  • Millerites and Seventh-day Sabbatarianism

  • Seventh-day Adventists

  • Worldwide Church of God

  • Advent Christian Church

  • Jehovah's Witnesses

  • Plymouth Brethren

  • Pentecostalism (early)



Holiness Movement: Though its roots are in the First Great Awakening and earlier, the Second Great Awakening brought with it a fresh emphasis on sanctification and just what that means. By the 1840s, a new emphasis on Holiness and Christian perfection had begun within American Methodism. This led to a distinction between Mainline Methodism and various Holiness churches. This movement found a great deal of traction in large part due to the revivalism and camp meetings which were happening in many areas of the country. As this movement grew, there were some splits and offshoot groups which emerged. It should be stressed that the emphasis (on Holiness and Christian perfection) was not restricted to the Methodist groups alone but spread in varying degrees to other Protestant groups as well.

It appears the primary focus of this movement was on human behaviour and sin. Some of the teachings which are attributed to this movement include:

  • Entire sanctification: “Entire sanctification, also known as Christian perfectionism or sometimes sinless perfection, is the teaching that a Christian can reach such a state of holiness that he or she ceases to sin in this life.” [Definition taken from gotquestions.org]

The Holiness movement believes that the "second work of grace" (also sometimes called the "second blessing") refers to a personal experience that happens after regeneration. The belief is that it is at this point the believer is cleansed from original sin. It was actually upon this doctrine (the attainment of complete freedom from sin) that the movement was built.

  • Definition of sin: Adherents hold to a distinctive definition of (actual) sin. They believe that "only conscious sins are truly sins." Historian Charles Jones explained, "Believing that sin was conscious disobedience to a known law of God, holiness believers were convinced that the true Christian, having repented of every known act of sin, did not and could not wilfully sin again and remain a Christian." Historian Benjamin Pettit in his book, [“The Great Privilege of All Believers.” p. 170] described the approach of the Wesleyan-Holiness movement as:

1. "The person who sins is not a Christian but a sinner.

2. When a person is saved, he is out of the sin business (may but must not sin)

3. The sinner must repent and be restored to his lost relationship with God.

4. To sin results in spiritual death."

In his study of this question, Caleb Black concluded that "the consensus understanding of sin in the Holiness tradition is that sin is an avoidable, voluntary, morally responsible act that those born of God do not commit."[Black, Caleb. “What About Sin?: An Appraisal of the Nature of Sin in the American Holiness Tradition” (p. 86).]

Dr. Timothy Cooley explained, "If this definition is compromised, victorious Christian living becomes meaningless, and entire sanctification an impossibility." [Black, Caleb. “What About Sin?: An Appraisal of the Nature of Sin in the American Holiness Tradition” (p. 1)] "The definition and consequences of sin are a key theological distinctive of the Holiness Movement as it underlies their entire theological system. To differ on the conception of sin is to destroy the foundation of holiness theology." [p.86]

  • Lifestyle: “Holiness churches have been distinguished from other churches by their more careful lifestyle. Many churches and denominations in the Holiness movement prohibit smoking, drinking, dancing, listening to inappropriate worldly music, or wearing makeup or flashy clothes." [Ron Rhodes, The Complete Guide to Christian Denominations: Understanding the History, Beliefs, and Differences (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 2015)]



Adventism: During this same time period there was a renewed interest in prophecy particularly as it relates to the second coming of Jesus. Throughout the 1800 or so years since Christ had returned to Heaven, there had been numerous predictions of when He would return in the Second Coming. It was from this renewed interest in prophecy that Adventism (as a movement) emerged in North America in the 1830s and 1840s. Advent views were preached by, “ministers such as William Miller, (whose followers became known as Millerites). The name “Adventism,” refers to belief in the soon Second Advent of Jesus (popularly known as the Second coming) and resulted in several major religious denominations, including Seventh-day Adventists and Advent Christians.” [Gary Land, Adventism in America: A History (1998)]

Adventism is a branch of Protestant Christianity that believes in the imminent Second Coming (or the "Second Advent") of Jesus Christ. It started as a movement when Baptist preacher William Miller first publicly shared his belief that the Second Coming would occur October 22, 1844. After Miller's prophecy failed, the Millerite movement split up but those that didn’t return to their original home churches, continued on in a number of Advent groups that held different doctrines from one another. These groups, stemming from a common Millerite ancestor, collectively became known as the Adventist movement.

Basically, the Adventist churches hold much in common with many other mainline Christian groups. However, they do have some theological differences on whether the intermediate state of the dead is unconscious sleep or consciousness, whether the ultimate punishment of the wicked is annihilation or eternal torment, the nature of immortality, whether the wicked are resurrected after the millennium, and whether the sanctuary of Daniel 8 refers to the one in heaven or one on earth.

Other groups whose focus was also intently on the Second Coming of Christ, but who did not accept Millers calculations, were quite plentiful as well. A number of other dates were predicted and theories advanced concerning the return of Christ. Some of those movements and theories (which began in that period) remain up to this day; not the least of which is “Dispensational Premillennialism” and the so called “Secret Rapture” concept.

Allow me to give just a few examples of alternate theories and beliefs that emerged as part of the “Advent movement” during, or soon after, the 2nd great awakening:

Futurist view of the second coming: It is my opinion that many of the theories and belief systems that emerged during this time, did so because they found fertile soil in which to sprout. It was in the soil of the late 18th century that the seeds of futurism first sprouted and then blossomed. From what I’ve read, it seems futurism began to take root in the Protestant church about 200 years ago. With this understanding in mind, I thought it important to briefly touch on the “Futurist view” and a brief overview concerning its development.

It would be very difficult to begin such an overview without bringing a Jesuit priest by the name of “Manuel de Lacunza y Díaz” (1731-1801) into the discussion. It was his work that was key to the introduction of futurism into the field of prophetic eschatology with the belief that the end of the world is imminent, (even within one's own lifetime). This futuristic view became foundational to beliefs which took root and flourished in the early nineteenth century and became very much a part of the Advent movement.

In 1791 he completed this famous voluminous work on the subject that he began around 1775. His work then went on to become very well known in Latin America and Europe. Lacunza’s work had a great impact on the cause and increase of prophetic studies at the beginning of the nineteenth century. His work spoke about the premillennial advent of Christ, and was studied by the British millenarians. His voluminous treatise was in fact, investigated at the Albury Park Conferences and at Powerscourt house; the importance of both Albury and Powerscourt will become quite evident shortly in relation to the advent theories of John N Darby.

...Furthermore, it has been found that futurism was not the original approach held by the early church, nor by the church of the Middle Ages and the Reformation. Research shows that the early Fathers were not futurists in the modern meaning of the word. In a certain sense, the early church Fathers had futurist views because for them everything was future. The early Christians were convinced that the final age of history had arrived; the new age had already dawned, and the end was imminent. To quote one example, Hippolytus (160-233), who produced the most extensive treatise of biblical eschatology found among the Fathers, argued that the end of the world would come about A.D. 500....

...In their writings, the early Fathers followed the historicist approach as the correct method to interpret the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation. Irenaeus and Hippolytus both used the historicist approach in their interpretation of the coming antichrist. For them everything was future, and, consequently, they cannot with fairness be cited for the modern futuristic system that holds that most of the prophecies still are in the future, at the end of the Christian era. This rival eschatology, futurism, founded by Francisco de Ribera, whose posture constitutes the groundwork for the whole structure of Roman Catholic futurism concerning the Antichrist, had a tremendous impact on prophetic studies and gradually became more prominent in the nineteenth century. It is crystal clear that the cradle for contemporary futurism was actually constructed by Catholic theologians to counteract the Reformers’ historicist method of interpretation.”

**note: [the above quote, as well as the comments I’ve summarized about Lacunza, were taken from: Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 9/1–2 (1998): 71–95. Article copyright © 2000 by David Pio Gullon. “Two Hundred Years from Lacunza: The Impact of His Eschatological Thought on Prophetic Studies and Modern Futurism,” David Pio Gullon, River Plate University https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1342&context=jats]

Out of this move toward Futurism and prophecy came a number of theories, dates, doctrines and peculiar definitions. As examples we have:

- The October 22, 1844: second coming prediction of the Millerite movement.

- 1891 Joseph Smith, (prophet) Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In a revelation dated 2 April 1843, and published as scripture in Doctrine and Covenants 130:14–17 Joseph Smith wrote: "I was once praying very earnestly to know the time of the coming of the Son of Man, when I heard a voice repeat the following: Joseph, my son, if thou livest until thou art eighty-five years old, thou shalt see the face of the Son of Man; therefore let this suffice, and trouble me no more on this matter.”

- 1914 The Jehovah’s Witness organization believe Christ returned (in spiritual form) that year and will be fully revealed (physically) soon.

- 1917 Many within various Pentecostal groups believed this to be earth’s final year. The following quote is from a Masters Thesis by Christopher J. Richmann, “Sanctification, Ecstasy, and War : the Development of American Pentecostal Eschatology, 1898-1950.”

[https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=ma_theses]

The popular reaction to the events of World War I, shown clearly in the Assemblies’ official organ, ‘The Christian Evangel’ (later known as The Weekly Evangel and The Pentecostal Evangel), reveal the group’s preference for eschatological rhetoric. At the outset of the war, articles on the Second Coming of Jesus appeared weekly for two months. During the climax and final year of the war in 1917, hardly an edition passed without reference to Jesus’ immediate coming, with titles like “Times of the End,” “Signs of the Approaching End,” and “He is Near.”

The war provided for many Pentecostals a concrete example of the “signs of the times,” as they revealed God’s end time plan for human history. The first Pentecostals rallied around the belief in an immediate, premillennial Second Coming of Christ, and this hope was sustained by the First World War. The chaos and tumult caused by the war allowed many Pentecostals to maintain a fervent hope in the Advent of Christ despite increasing organizationalism.

Although most were content to admit that no one would know the day or the hour of Jesus’ arrival, some were more speculative, hinting that 1917 was in fact the cataclysmic year that would bring about the end. Some manoeuvred around the traditional teaching that humans will not know the hour of the Second Coming by pointing out that the disciples were given this injunction prior to receiving the Spirit. “The fault of the disciples was that they were enquiring into future events without the unction and guidance of the Holy Ghost.”



- 1879 Christ returned - as believed by Christian Science - established by Mary Baker Eddy.

As Jesus' advent marked what may be designated the "first coming" of the Christ, so no less certainly Mary Baker Eddy's discovery of Christian Science fulfilled the prophecy of the "second coming." Thus, the oneness of the Christ now stands revealed in its completeness, for the blessing and salvation of all humanity. The need of humanity is to awake to this sublime fact, to lay hold of and utilize it, thereby gaining the fullness of salvation whereby the perfect man in God's likeness appears.” [https://journal.christianscience.com/issues/1939/11/57-8/the-second-coming]

To “reinstate primitive Christianity and its lost element of healing” was the stated purpose of the Church of Christ, Scientist, which she founded with 15 students in Lynn, Massachusetts, in 1879.” [https://www.britannica.com/biography/Mary-Baker-Eddy/Work-as-founder]

I’ve already mentioned William Miller. The Millerite movement (which led to “the Great Disappointment” of October 22, 1844) became foundational to the formation of the Seventh-day Adventist denomination... as well as several other Adventist organizations. It is now time to take a look at John N Darby, his theories and the acolytes that accepted and followed his views.

John Nelson Darby was a curate in County Wicklow, Ireland. He, along with three other men (Anthony Norris Groves, a dentist studying theology at Trinity College; Edward Cronin, studying medicine, John Gifford Bellett, a lawyer who brought them together) began, “The Brethren movement.” This movement subsequently became better known as “The Plymouth Brethren,” and they began meeting in 1825 in Dublin Ireland. The movement was to undergo a number of disagreements and splits, but the followers that most closely followed Darby’s theories were often referred to as Darbyites.

An important early stimulus was the study of prophecy – specifically 2nd advent prophecy. This topic was the subject of a number of annual meetings at Powerscourt House in County Wicklow. Lady Powerscourt had previously attended Henry Drummond's prophecy conferences at Albury Park. As mentioned earlier, it was at those conferences that the “Futurist” theory of Jesuit priest Lacunza was studied and and gained much momentum.

As a reminder, this is what was I wrote earlier: “In 1791 he completed this famous voluminous work on the subject that he began around 1775. His work then went on to become very well known in Latin America and Europe. Lacunza’s work had a great impact on the cause and increase of prophetic studies at the beginning of the nineteenth century. His work spoke about the premillennial advent of Christ, and was studied by the British millenarians. His voluminous treatise was in fact, investigated at the Albury Park Conferences and at Powerscourt house; the importance of both Albury and Powerscourt will become quite evident shortly in relation to the advent theories of John N Darby.”

Peter David Lee submitted his dissertation to the University of Wales in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy dated 2010. His topic, “The shaping of John Nelson Darby’s Eschatology” [https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/2235/1/2235 Lee%2C P. Shaping (2010).pdf]. He writes:

The Albury and Powerscourt prophetical conferences saw the birth of a new form of premillennial dispensationalism that has shaped evangelical eschatology ever since. It owed its debut to John Nelson Darby, who espoused the centrality of the “two peoples of God.”

Dispensationalism affirmed three cardinal doctrines: first, a sharp dichotomy between the two peoples of God—national Israel and the church; second, God’s glory rather than the covenant of grace defining His purpose in history; and third, the hermeneutical principle of a literal interpretation of Scripture.

This dispensationalism was indeed revolutionary, displacing the traditional historicist hermeneutic, with its system of date-setting, in favour of futurism, with its doctrine of imminency. This forced Darby to deal with the problem of what to do with the church so that God could fulfill his redemptive plan regarding national Israel. He resolved this by providing for a rapture of the church and by inserting a gap of an indeterminate number of years in the last part of Daniel’s seventy-week prophecy.

The question that arises over this new doctrine of premillennial, pretribulational dispensationalism concerns its provenance, since Darby is widely credited as its originator. There is good reason for this. His influence can be seen in C. I. Scofield’s Reference Bible, as well as such popular novels as Hal Lindsey’s The Late, Great Planet Earth and Timothy LaHaye’s Left Behind series. There are two dominant schools of thought regarding Darby and the origin of dispensationalism. One traces his dispensationalism back to the Patristic Writings, and the other sees Darby as “inventing” his system. Both are incorrect, as I will demonstrate by tracing his eschatology to earlier thinkers to show that Darby “adapted” extant doctrines to form his unique system.”

Of Lady Powerscourt and her prophetic conferences Peter David Lee writes:

She was deeply immersed in biblical prophecy, looking for the end of the world and the restoration of the Jewish nation. A year before her death, she wrote her missive entitled Lady Powerscourt’s Questions for 1835. The narrative included the following rather precise remarks: “Monday, 5 o’clock, September 7th, 1835.—What will be the history of the remnant after the return of the Jews? what the measure of renovation of the earth in the millennium?... Wednesday.—Does each dispensation end in apostasy only? or, is the dispensation revived in a remnant, the rejection of which consummates the apostasy?”

In looking into the doctrinal/prophetic views of the LDS church, I was surprised to learn the dispensational idea of two peoples of God and that the Jews would return to Israel is not dissimilar to a prophetic view held by the Mormons. Their 10th Article of Faith (which was a statement of beliefs composed by their prophet, Joseph Smith) states: "We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in the restoration of the Ten Tribes." In 1841 the LDS Church sent apostle Orson Hyde to the Holy Land to dedicate the land for the return of the Jewish people. They also believe a third temple is to be built in Jerusalem.

In the section of his dissertation titled, “Conclusions from the Albury and Powerscourt conferences,” Peter David Lee writes:

One of those that attended Albury 1826 was S. R. Maitland. Such delegates as Frere, Irving, and Drummond were still maintaining historicism; however, as David Bebbington points out:

[In] 1826 there appeared a book arguing strongly for a futurist interpretation of Revelation in order to undermine all millenarian notions. The unintended effect of this work by S. R. Maitland, the future historian, was to inspire an alternative tradition of millennial thought. At Albury, Maitland’s theory that Revelation was yet to be fulfilled, was already being canvassed, and by 1843 half a dozen other writers had taken the field in favour of the same principle.. . . But the most significant figure to adopt a form of futurist premillennialism was J. N. Darby . . . He steadily elaborated the view that the predictions of Revelation would be fulfilled after believers had been caught up to meet Christ in the air, the so called ‘rapture.’

Irving himself was greatly influenced by his translation of Lacunza’s, “The Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty” (1827) and shifted his view from historicism to futurism.* Thus at Albury there was a tension and division along two distinct lines of interpretation, namely, historicism and futurism. Powerscourt tended to follow more along the line of futurism, as explained by George Eldon Ladd: “It was in these Powerscourt meetings that some of the characteristic doctrines of ‘Darbyism’ can be discovered for the first time. Out of this revival of interest in prophetic truth came two new interpretations: futurism and ‘Darbyism.’” Ladd is also in agreement with Bebbington in ascribing futurism to Maitland: “The rediscovery of futurism is associated with the names of S. R. Maitland, James Todd, and William Burgh.” Bebbington adds his thoughts to those of Ladd: “But the most significant figure to adopt a form of futurist premillennialism was J. N. Darby, the fertile mind behind another adventist sect, the Brethren.” Herbert Douglass offers insight into futurism at Powerscourt: “Hard as it is to believe, several scholars of the famous Powerscourt meetings (much to the protest of their colleagues) advocated this new position as an important ingredient in their developing outline of a brand new premillennialism. It seemed to be the incentive that two other struggling ideas needed: (1) futurism, the concept that the seventieth week of Daniel 9 and the prophecies of Revelation 4 to 22 were yet future events to be completed during the seven years immediately preceding the return of Jesus in judgment and (2) Darby’s dispensationalism.” David Faust, quoting from the Dictionary of Premillennialism, states that “The Powerscourt Conferences of 1831 to 1833 most probably moved Darby from his earlier historicist premillennialism to futurist premillennialism....’

...Both Irving and Darby parted company with the church but for different reasons. Irving was ousted by both the London and Annan presbyteries because of his acceptance of speaking in tongues by others, whereas Darby’s secession was due to his understanding of the ruin of the church. (*note: The Church of Ireland is what is being spoken of here) Scott Gibson, in speaking of both Darby and Irving, supports this thesis: “Irving was the rejected Church of Scotland minister who advocated premillennial views and the regaining of apostolic gifts of tongues .. .” While there was much ecclesiology that found mutual acceptance between Irving and Darby, the apostolic gift of tongues remained a source of division. In speaking of the rapture of the saints, Martyn Lloyd-Jones comments: “Only J. N. Darby and certain of his followers accepted it, though they entirely disassociated themselves from Edward Irving when he began to talk about the tongues, the visions, the apostles and so on.’”

As can be clearly seen, it is impossible to look at the second great awakening without recognizing the importance of the Advent movement as one of the significant factors driving this period of history. During my lifetime I’ve already spent time in two different advent camps. I was born into and raised in one advent camp and more recently I briefly believed and endorsed (for about a year) the teaching of an alternate, 2nd great awakening, advent view. Let me be as clear as I possibly can be; I do not accept either of those two views BUT I do believe in the second coming. I believe Jesus is coming back as he promised. However, when it comes to the two camps that I’ve been a part of, well, quite frankly I think each one was just as mistaken (dare I say deceived?) as the other in their theology. I believe each group reads their belief system into the text of scripture rather than gleaning it from scripture.



Conclusion: How does one retain the benefits gained from our past, without having to repeat all the past mistakes? It seems we should know the answer to this question and yet fail in applying this knowledge. History should be our greatest teacher and a reminder of the trouble we can get into when we fail to learn and observe the lessons of the past. Indeed, it has been said, and frequently repeated, “Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them!”

Is it because of our human propensity to forget the lessons of the past… or perhaps the desire to rewrite history (which many seem to possess) – that we need to be reminded to remember so frequently? The Bible is full of passages where God’s people are told to remember or sometimes it is phrased as the command do not forget!

Paul, in his letter to the Philippians writes: “Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, 13 for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure.” (Philippians 2:12-13). I have read different thoughts and ways of understanding this passage and I do believe there is much to be taken from these two verses. As I look at it (and in particular the portion I’ve underlined) a question comes to my mind. What was Paul worried or concerned about with respect to them working out their salvation with fear and trembling, in his absence? Might he be concerned they would fail to remember what he had taught them? When the church (in this case it’s at Philippi) are in the process of working out their salvation, and Paul is no longer there to teach or direct them, they are cautioned to do so carefully with humility and respect.

Throughout history God’s people repeatedly got themselves into trouble by failing to remember. Needless difficulty and pain was the consequence of failure to remember either what God had done for them in past circumstances, or forgot the painful lessons they had needed to go through for disobedience and breaking faith with God in the past. This I believe can be demonstrated in Israel’s past and can also be seen at times within the history of the church.

In the “Wisdom” literature of scripture we have this passage in Ecclesiastes 1:9 – 11:

9 “What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.

10 Is there anything of which one can say, “Look! This is something new?” It was here already, long ago; it was here before our time.

11 No one remembers the former generations, and even those yet to come will not be remembered by those who follow them.”

It seems to me that the devil does not (indeed can not) employ new strategies in attacking individuals or the people of God collectively. He has been very successfully running the same scam over and over again. He is not a creator rather the devil is a repurposer whose aim is to lie, kill and destroy. If we were faithful in preserving our history and remembering the lessons of the past, I believe the devil would not be nearly as successful.

Only God can (and does) claim to do anything new. Isaiah 43:19 says: “Behold, I am doing a new thing; now it springs forth, do you not perceive it? I will make a way in the wilderness and rivers in the desert.” 2 Corinthians 5:17 says: “Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away. Behold, the new has come!”

So how does this relate to the periods of awakenings – and the 2nd great awakening in particular? I suspect at least part of the answer is that people had gotten careless, failed to remember lessons of the past and many had fallen away. This, in turn precipitated consequences which were worrisome and unpleasant which created the fertile soil for the revivals which then followed. As part of this process, many old debates ended up needing to be re-argued, much that had been learned in the past had to be revisited and many lessons needed to be repeated.

I believe that God, who is ever patient with us, was present in this time period and prepared to guide us through it yet again. The forces of darkness, evil and confusion were also present and not standing idly by. They also had influence in some of the outcomes – as they have each time there has been a revival. Out of this period came a significant number of peculiar, I might even say crazy and cultish ideas. These were a part of the process of having to repeat old (and unfortunately forgotten) lessons. It is unfortunate that some of these ideas have become distractions which persist to this day.



*** Note: Nicene Christianity includes those Christian denominations that adhere to the teaching of the Nicene Creed, which was formulated at the First Council of Nicaea in AD 325 and amended at the First Council of Constantinople in AD 381. The modern wording goes as follows:

We believe in one God, the Father, the Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all that is, seen and unseen.

We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, of one being with the Father. Through him all things were made. For us and for our salvation he came down from heaven: by the power of the Holy Spihe became incarnate from the Virgin Mary, and was made man. For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate; he suffered death and was buried. On the third day he rose again in accordance with the Scriptures; he ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will have no end.

We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father [and the Son]. With the Father and the Son he is worshiped and glorified. He has spoken through the Prophets. We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church. We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins. We look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. AMEN.”

I think this is a very good foundational statement and I think we must be very careful about anything we might want to add to that creed or anything we might wish to change within it.